TP2400x272B

The best strategies we have tested

The page below shows the most profitable strategies we found in the 50 page research paper called Quantitative Value Investing in Europe: What Works for Achieving Alpha as well as all our research since then.

Easy to implement

Even though the strategies may look complicated at first don’t let that worry you, they are all easy to implement with the screener. And if you struggle remember help is just an email away.

Don’t choose the highest returns, rather find the right strategy for you

These are all strategies with very good returns and your goal here is not to choose the highest return strategy.

Your goal is to choose the strategy that matches your investment style. This will also be the strategy you feel most comfortable with and the one that will allow you to sleep comfortably at night.

I’m interested, sign me up

Neglected, Value and Momentum - Europe

 

A simple idea

Even though it may seem really complicated the basic idea is very simple:

  • First find companies with good share price momentum
  • Then look for neglected companies with low traded volume compared to profits, ignored by most fund managers and brokers
  • Then remove low quality businesses with low profit margins
  • Choose the 20 most undervalued companies in terms of operating profits to enterprise value

 

How are the companies selected?

Before we get to the details of the strategy the following table gives you a summary of how the strategy selects investment ideas:

NVM_Strategy_BT_1
Click image to enlarge

 

Momentum

If there's one fact that came out of our research study it is that if you want high returns you have to consider share price momentum.

To select investment ideas for the NVM Strategy we use medium term (6 month) share price momentum so that only companies with an upward moving share price are selected.

This also helps you avoid value trap companies as they mostly have falling share prices.

In the screener as a Primary Factor choose Price Index 6m from the drop down list under the heading Momentum and then with the slider select the top 30% of companies with the best Price index 6m as shown below.

 NVM_Strategy_BT_4

 

Neglected Companies

Next you want to select companies that are neglected by the market and thus are more likely to be undervalued.

You do this by only selecting companies where the yearly traded volume is low compared to profitability.

Because these companies have low traded volume they are not on the radar screen of fund managers with large amounts of money to invest as they can’t buy enough of the company to have any impact on the fund’s performance.

Also brokers (and their analysts) are not interested in these companies as they cannot make enough money trading the company’s shares to make it profitable for them to research the company.

In the screener as a Secondary Factor choose Liquidity (Q.i.) from the drop down list under the Valuation heading. Select the most illiquid 20% of companies with the slider as you can see below.

NVM_Strategy_BT_5 

 

Quality

The next step is to remove all the low quality businesses. You do this by removing or screening out companies with low profit margins compared to assets.

Even though this ratio may seem odd at first studies have found that it is one of the best ways to identify quality companies.

In the screener as a Third Factor choose Gross Margin (Marx) from the drop down list under the Quality heading. Use the slider to select the top 60% of companies with the highest Gross Margin (Marx) values. 

 NVM_Strategy_BT_6

 

Valuation

After doing all the above you then sort the companies that pass all the above criteria by Earnings Yield (earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT) to Enterprise value) which research studies have shown in the best valuation ratio you can use to identify undervalued companies as it also takes the capital structure (debt, equity and cash) of the company into consideration.

In the screener go to the column Earnings Yield and click on the column heading to sort the column from high to low.

To sort from high to low you must click the column heading twice because if the first time you do the column will be sorted from low to high which is not what you want (you want the small arrow to point down) as shown in the screenshot below.

 NVM_Strategy_BT_7

 

Buy the top 20 companies

Once you have completed all the above steps the strategy invested in the 20 companies with the highest earnings yield.

  

 

1374.2% over 13 years or 22.7% per year

The following table summarises the returns the strategy generated over a period of just more than 13 years. 

NVM_Strategy_BT_2

Click image to enlarge

 

13.2 times your initial investment

As you can see in just over 13 years the strategy returned nearly 1320% or 13.2 times your original investment, outperforming the market by nearly 20% per year.

 

Yearly performance

The following table shows the yearly performance of the strategy compared to the European STOXX 600 Total Return Index which includes dividends:

NVM_Strategy_BT_3

Click image to enlarge

(*) Inception date 29-06-2001
(**) End date 22-08-2014

 

Growth of your investment in the strategy

This chart shows the growth of investing €1 in the strategy compared to if you invested in the European STOXX 600 Total Return Index (dividends included).

 NVM_Strategy_BT_8

Click image to enlarge

 

This chart also shows your return of investing €1 in the NUM Strategy and the index but it used a logarithmic scale to show that the index is even more volatile than the NVM Strategy.

NVM_Strategy_BT_9 

Click image to enlarge

 

 

Summary

As you have seen the Neglected, Value and Momentum investment strategy would have given you outstanding returns if you used it over the past 13 years.

But, like any equity investment strategy it is not without risk as you can see with the 52.3% maximum fall in the value of the portfolio. Even though this fall took place during the 2008 - 2009 financial crisis keeping your faith in the strategy, or just remaining invested in the stock market, after such a large loss is very difficult.

But in the end you can see that your ability to stick to the strategy would have been very worthwhile.


Period
Jun 2001 - Aug 2014

Index
+3.5% pa

Return
+22.7% pa +1374.2% 13.16yrs